★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Elekta AB (publ)

EKTA B · NASDAQ Stockholm

Market cap (USD)$2.1B
SectorHealthcare
IndustryMedical - Instruments & Supplies
CountrySE
Data as of
Moat score
91/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Elekta AB (publ) supplies radiotherapy systems and oncology software, with FY2025/26 revenue split 55.8% Solutions and 44.2% Service. Reported sales fell 7% but rose 1% in constant currency; restructuring and impairments produced a SEK517M net loss. The July annual report confirms an installed base of about 7,500 devices, high service-contract attachment, and a 23% SaaS share of oncology-information-system orders. Specialized engineering and regulation create the clearest Solutions barrier, while attached maintenance, upgrades, and software support underpin Service. Elekta reports Q1 on August 27. Key risks are public-tender pricing, emerging-market volatility, technological leapfrogging, and open interoperability weakening software lock-in.

Primary segment

Solutions

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

40%-44% (reported)

HHI:

Coverage

2 segments · 5 tags

Updated 2026-07-12

Segments

Solutions

Radiotherapy treatment delivery systems and oncology software solutions (linacs, MR-Linacs, stereotactic radiosurgery, treatment planning & oncology information systems)

Revenue

55.8%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

40%-44% (reported)

Peers

SHL.DEARAY6501.T

Service

Maintenance, service contracts, upgrades, and software/license support for Elekta-installed radiotherapy systems

Revenue

44.2%

Structure

Quasi-Monopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

SHL.DEARAY

Moat Claims

Solutions

Radiotherapy treatment delivery systems and oncology software solutions (linacs, MR-Linacs, stereotactic radiosurgery, treatment planning & oncology information systems)

Revenue share computed from the FY2025/26 annual report: Solutions SEK 9,325M of total SEK 16,718M. The report says Elekta Evo cleared its last major regulatory hurdle with U.S. FDA approval during the year.

Oligopoly

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Radiotherapy equipment is a highly specialized category with few global competitors; sustained R&D and engineering know-how create a high barrier to entry.

Capex Knowhow Scale moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Technological leapfrogging by large competitors
  • Hospital capex deferrals and pricing pressure in tenders
  • Component shortages or manufacturing disruptions

Leading indicators

  • Order intake growth (Solutions)
  • New platform launch cadence (linacs/MR-Linacs)
  • Solutions gross margin trend

Counterarguments

  • Large peers can match or exceed R&D and manufacturing scale
  • Differentiation can be episodic as features diffuse across vendors

Compliance Advantage

Legal

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 3 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Deep regulatory expertise and clinical validation requirements favor incumbents in radiotherapy devices and software.

Compliance Advantage moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Regulatory changes reducing complexity or increasing standardization
  • Quality events/recalls damaging credibility with regulators and customers

Leading indicators

  • Regulatory approvals/clearances (FDA/CE) for new systems and software
  • Product quality metrics (field actions, recalls)

Counterarguments

  • Regulatory capability is learnable and well-funded entrants can hire experienced teams
  • Regulation can also slow incumbent iteration and raise costs

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength

Strength 2 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 3 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 3 of 5

Elekta's software suite (planning + oncology information) can become embedded in clinic workflows; SaaS migration can increase recurring revenue and integration stickiness.

Data Workflow Lockin moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Interoperability standards and vendor-neutral platforms reducing switching friction
  • Customer preference for best-of-breed point solutions
  • Security/regulatory constraints slowing cloud adoption in healthcare

Leading indicators

  • SaaS share of oncology information system orders
  • Software order growth
  • Renewal/retention disclosures for software subscriptions

Counterarguments

  • Hospitals can multi-home software; integration via standards can reduce lock-in
  • Large vendors can bundle software with hardware to displace incumbents

Service

Maintenance, service contracts, upgrades, and software/license support for Elekta-installed radiotherapy systems

Revenue share computed from the FY2025/26 annual report: Service SEK 7,393M of total SEK 16,718M. The new report confirms approximately 7,500 installed devices, high service-contract attachment, and service revenue growing faster than the installed base.

Quasi-Monopoly

Installed Base Consumables

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Recurring service contracts and lifecycle revenue (maintenance, upgrades, licenses) are driven by a large installed base and service contract attachment.

Installed Base Consumables moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Independent service organizations expanding capabilities
  • Renewal price pressure and customer insourcing
  • Remote/AI diagnostics lowering differentiation in service delivery

Leading indicators

  • Service revenue growth rate
  • Service gross margin and attach rate (if disclosed)
  • Installed base size and upgrade penetration

Counterarguments

  • Some customers can use third-party maintenance for older equipment
  • Service margins can compress as contracts rebid or standardized

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 3 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Global coverage (local offices + distributor network) and field/remote service capabilities support uptime for mission-critical systems.

Service Field Network moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Remote service tools commoditizing support
  • Field talent shortages increasing costs and response times

Leading indicators

  • Service response times and uptime commitments (if disclosed)
  • Renewal rates for service contracts
  • Customer satisfaction metrics (NPS) if reported

Counterarguments

  • Third-party service providers can replicate coverage in mature markets
  • Remote support reduces the importance of physical network density

Evidence

other

The competitive landscape in radiotherapy is characterized by a limited number of global companies competing in this highly specialized field.

Supports concentrated market structure and high specialization/entry barriers.

investor_day

Barriers to entrance are high - significant R&D and high regulatory scrutiny.

Management explicitly frames the category as high-barrier due to R&D intensity and regulation.

other

Elekta has established technology leadership through... extensive regulatory expertise...

Company highlights regulatory expertise as a contributor to technology leadership.

other

Elekta ONE brings together our digital solutions to simplify the workflows with a unified experience.

Positions software as workflow infrastructure, although the report also stresses open standards and multivendor interoperability.

other

23% of Oncology Information Systems (OIS) software orders are SaaS 2025/26.

Shows subscription adoption, but not customer retention or exclusive lock-in.

Showing 5 of 11 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Technological leapfrogging by large competitors
  • Hospital capex deferrals and pricing pressure in tenders
  • Component shortages or manufacturing disruptions
  • Regulatory changes reducing complexity or increasing standardization
  • Quality events/recalls damaging credibility with regulators and customers
  • Interoperability standards and vendor-neutral platforms reducing switching friction

Leading indicators

  • Order intake growth (Solutions)
  • New platform launch cadence (linacs/MR-Linacs)
  • Solutions gross margin trend
  • Regulatory approvals/clearances (FDA/CE) for new systems and software
  • Product quality metrics (field actions, recalls)
  • SaaS share of oncology information system orders

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-28
Updated 2026-07-12

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.